On Equity Curves and the Long Run

A positive expectancy does not promise a pleasant path. It promises only that, if you survive long enough and do not corrupt your sizing, the distribution of outcomes becomes asymmetrically favorable over many trials.

The equity curve is where this distinction becomes emotionally expensive. In concept, expectancy is simple: a weighted average of outcomes. In operation, expectancy is invisible—because any single path is dominated by variance. The curve you live through is not “expectancy made visible.” It is one realization among many, often indistinguishable from failure for long stretches, even when the underlying edge is real.

This is the first discipline: do not ask the curve to confirm the model on your schedule. Markets elongate variance. A correct allocation may look incorrect for months. Drawdowns unfold slowly. The discomfort is not evidence. It is the admission price.

The second discipline is to separate process truth from path noise. In Advantage Play, truth is a slowly accumulating property. Early sequences are fragile. A short stretch of gains does not validate; a short stretch of losses does not refute. Both are common under a correct model. If you cannot tolerate the curve being wrong-looking while the process remains right, you do not yet own the system—you are leasing it from your emotions.

The third discipline is to understand what an equity curve is: a cumulative sum of random variables under a sizing rule. It is not a report card; it is a ledger. And like any ledger, it will show you drawdowns as plainly as it shows you gains. The presence of drawdown is not a defect. The inability to withstand it is the defect.

This is where most positive-EV frameworks fail: not in mathematics, but in expectations of shape. People expect the long run to feel like a smooth ascent. In practice, the long run is a jagged climb with long plateaus, false summits, slow recoveries, and uncomfortable stretches below prior peaks. Many correct strategies spend a large fraction of time “underwater” relative to their high-water mark. This is not pathology. It is geometry.

The mean is not the path.

If you remember only one thing: expectancy governs outcomes only in aggregate; variance governs them in sequence. The equity curve is sequence.

So what, then, is a reasonable expectation for an equity curve under positive expectancy?

Reasonable does not mean optimistic. Reasonable means compatible with survival.

A reasonable expectation is that you will experience:

  • Extended periods where nothing “seems to work,” even as the underlying edge remains intact.
  • Drawdowns that feel slow, not dramatic. (Markets rarely break you with a single blow; they grind.)
  • Recoveries that take longer than you want. (Loss is geometrically heavier than gain.)
  • Long intervals where the model’s correctness is not emotionally rewarded.
  • Occasional sequences of easy gains that are dangerous precisely because they soften your discipline.

This tract exists to prevent the final failure mode: mistaking discomfort for disproof, and then changing the process to relieve the discomfort. That act converts edge into fragility.

The Advantage Play Engine already contains the mandate for how to respond:

  • If modeled asymmetry is absent, do nothing.
  • If asymmetry exists but survivability is threatened, size down.
  • If evidence is thin, attenuate confidence.
  • If the path is uncomfortable but the model remains coherent, continue without improvisation.

A correct equity curve expectation is therefore not “up and to the right.” It is: survivable, statistically coherent, and not dependent on being early.

And because the greatest danger arrives after success, the final expectation must be stated plainly: as the curve rises, your risk tolerance will attempt to rise with it. This is the moment when the system asks for restraint and the operator attempts to purchase speed. When you “feel ahead,” you will be tempted to treat variance as conquered. It has not been conquered. It has merely been quiet.

Survival precedes compounding. Not once. Always.


A Monte Carlo Thought Experiment

Imagine a simple process: each year is a trial. The trial has a probability of a favorable outcome and an unfavorable outcome, with payoffs that resemble the Advantage Play Engine’s proxies—upside to target, downside to miss. Now imagine running that same process thousands of times, with the same expectancy and the same sizing discipline. You do not change the rules; you only change the random sequence.

What emerges is the point this appendix exists to protect: a distribution cannot be judged by a single realized path.

Across those thousands of simulated curves you would observe patterns that are psychologically familiar, and therefore dangerous. Many positive-expectancy paths look broken early. Many spend long intervals below prior highs. Some recover slowly, with no clean turning point. Some produce gains in clusters and then go quiet. A few paths dominate the final wealth not because they were “smarter,” but because they avoided early damage severe enough to reduce compounding’s base.

The lived equity curve is one draw from this wide field. It will often feel ambiguous even when the underlying edge is real. This is not a defect of the system. It is the normal consequence of variance acting through time.

The operational corollary is simple: when the curve feels wrong, do not improvise to make it feel right. Run integrity checks instead. Confirm the data is correct, the regime classification is coherent, the assumptions have not drifted, and sizing remains within survival constraints. If the process remains sound, continue without embellishment. If the process is compromised, reduce exposure or stop. In either case, do not confuse discomfort with disproof.

The Advantage Play Engine does not promise a smooth ascent. It promises only this: if you preserve capital and refuse to corrupt the rules, the long run is permitted to occur.


The long run is not a mood, and it is not a promise. It is a requirement—earned by restraint. There will be seasons where you are correct and feel foolish anyway. Do not punish correctness for being slow. Do not “fix” a sound process because the curve refuses to flatter you. The market will eventually offer you the reward for discipline—but only if you remain intact long enough to receive it.